General manager southern railway v rangachari

Author: vdda

August undefined, 2024

WebOct 9, 2024 · Judgement. GAJENDRAGADKAR, J. : (On behalf of himself, Sarkar and Das Gupta JJ.) On a writ petition filed by the respondent K. Rangachari in the Madras High Court under Art. 226 of the Constitution a writ of mandamus has been issued by the said High Court restraining the appellants, the General Manager, Southern Railway, and the … WebMay 31, 2024 · For example, in General Manager, Southern Railway v. Rangachari, the Court took a very parochial view of Article 16 (4) of the Constitution of India and held that “ It is common ground that Art. 16(4) …

Reservation in Promotion - Legal-lore

WebFeb 1, 2024 · Union of India 17, this Court overruled its earlier judgment in General Manager, Southern Railway v. Rangachari 18 and held that reservation in promotions cannot be provided under Article 16 of the Constitution of India but directed the decision to be operative from five years from the date of the judgment. WebJun 30, 2016 · law as interpreted by this Court in General Manager, Southern Railway & Another v. Rangachari , AIR 1962 SC 36 . Indra Sawhney specifically overruled Rangachari to the extent that reservations in promotions were held in Rangachari to be permitted under Article 16(4) of the Constitution. the watch tv series wiki

General Manager, Southern Railway VS Rangachari Gurbux Das …

WebDealing with the extent of protection of Article 16(1) of the Constitution, this Court stated in General Manager, Southern Railway v. Rangachari 1962 2 SCR 586 at pp. 596-597 of the Report as follows: “It would be clear that matters relating to employment cannot be confined only to the initial matters prior to the act of employment. WebAfter the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of the General Manager, Southern Railway v. Rangachari, [1962] 2 S.C.R. 586, the matter was reviewed by the Central … WebIn The General Manager, Southern Railway v. Rangachari reported in [1962] 2 SCR 586 at 596 another Constitution Bench held that equality of opportunity need not be confused with absolute equality as such. What is guaranteed is the … the watch tv series cast

V.K. Sood Vs. Secretary, Civil Aviation & Ors. – Court Verdict

General manager southern railway v rangachari

The General Manager, Southern Railway Vs. Rangachari [1961] …

WebMar 21, 1997 · It is also contended that having declared the promotions under Article 16(1) and 16(4) of the Constitution as unconstitutional, overruling the judgment of a Bench of five judges of this Court in The General Manager, Southern Railway v. Rangachari 1962(2) SCR 586 the same being not correct in law. WebFeb 11, 2024 · In this case (General Manager, Southern Railway v A Rangachari), validity of the circulars issued by the Railway administration providing for reservation in favour of …

Did you know?

WebRangachari v/s General Manager, Southern Railway & Another W.P. No. 1051 of 1959 Decided On, 03 March 1960. At, High Court of Judicature at Madras By, THE HONOURABLE MR. ... The General Manager, Southern Railways, issued a circular on 12th June, 1959, to give effect to the direction of the Railway Board. After pointing out in … Webgeneral manager southern. railway gurbux das intervener vs. rangachari (case analysis) submitted by: - c. sancho roy – 20241bcl0015 k.l shreegowri -20241bcl0026 n. supriya – 20241bcl0019 presidency university bangalore 560064 name of the case general manager southern railway gurbux das intervener vs. rangachari. citations and alternative citations

WebThe General Manager, Southern Railway Vs. Rangachari [1961] INSC 198 (28 April 1961) The General Manager, Southern Railway Vs. Rangachari [1961] INSC 198 (28 April 1961) 1961 Latest Caselaw 198 SC. Pandit M. S. M. Sharma Vs. Shri Sri Krishna Sinha & Ors [1958] INSC 132 (12 December 1958) This appeal was directed against an … Web[464E-G] General Manager, Southern Railway v. Rangachari, [1962] 2 S.C.R. 586; applied. The Union of India v. Pandurang Kashinath More, AIR 1962 SC 630; differentiated 3. Where there is a specific charge of arbitrary discrimination or some hostile or improper motive is imputed to the authority terminating the service, it is incumbent on the ...

WebThis judgement also overruled General Manager Southern Railway v. Rangachari and Akhil Bharatiya Soshit Karamchari Sangh (Railway) v. Union of India verdicts, which said that … WebJan 27, 1998 · However, it ignored the Constitution Bench judgment in General Manager, Southern Railway v. Rangachari, A.I.R. 1962 S.C. 36, in which the narrow construction of the expression "matters relating to employment' used in Article 16(1) of the Constitution has been rejected by the Apex Court in the following words.

WebB. Supreme Court’s deference to reservation in promotion during post-Rangachari phase ..... 6 C. Indra Sawhney decision was based on the massive obiter of judges on reservation in promotion ..... 7 III. Introduction of Article 16(4A) in the Constitution and its consequences ..... 10 IV. M. Nagaraj v. Union of India and its adverse effect on ...

WebCourt in 1961, in General Manager , Southern Railway v. Rangachari.2 Two circulars3 issued by the Railway Board, reserving certain selection posts to the scheduled castes … the watch tv series ukWebJan 29, 2024 · The Supreme Court declared that its 2006 judgment in M. Nagaraj & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors. ... made by Attorney General for India to ... ratio in General Manager, Southern Railway v ... the watch tv showhttp://courtverdict.com/supreme-court-of-india/v-k-sood-vs-secretary-civil-aviation-ors the watch tv show amcWebOn a writ petition filed by the respondent K. Rangachari in the Madras High Court under Art. 226 of the Constitution a writ of mandamus has been issued by the said High Court restraining the appellants, the General Manager, Southern Railway, and the Personnel Officer (Reservation), Southern Railway, from giving effect to the directions of the ... the watch tv show castWebThe constitutional validity of the directions given by the Railway Board, which the General Manager seeks to implement, was challenged principally on two grounds. (1) Article 16 … the watch tv show reviewsWebFeb 6, 2014 · It all began with The General Manager), Southern Railway v. Rangachari(1). Two circulars issued by the Railway Board reserving selection (promotional) posts in Class III of the Railway Service in favour of the members of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes, were questioned in that case as offending … the watch tv show 2021WebOct 9, 2024 · General Manager, Southern Railway VS Rangachari Gurbux Das- 28 Apr 61 India - Supreme Court 2. T. Devadasan VS Union Of India- 29 Aug 63 India - … the watch ua